云南地区近震震级与面波震级转换关系研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者简介:

杨晶琼,女,1968年生,高级工程师,主要从事地震分析编目与数字地震资料应用研究。E-mail: yjq6@163.com

基金项目:

中国地震局“测震台网青年骨干培养专项”(20120104)资助


Study on the ML and MS of conversation in the Yunnan Regional Digital Networks
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [13]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    利用云南地区数字地震台站记录的云南及周边地区2000~2011年4.0级以上可同时测定近震震级ML和面波震级MS的433个地震波形数据,将速度数据进行仿真,即近震震级ML在仿真短周期地震仪DD-1记录上测定,面波震级MS在仿真中长周期地震仪SK记录上测定,对全部人工重新测定的ML和MS,采用线性回归和正交回归方法,得到了它们之间的转换关系式。结果表明,自20世纪70年代使用至今的公式MS = 1.13ML - 1.08与云南地区实际情况存在系统偏差,已不适用于云南地区。考虑到区域差异,认为采用关系式MS = 1.13ML - 0.86作为新的转换关系更合理适用。同时,对云南地震台网和国家地震台网都有记录的地震数据进行对比,发现云南台网和国家台网测定的绝大多数地震ML差值为- 0.2~ 0.4,差值为0.2的地震数量最多;MS差值为-0.4~0.2,差值为-0.2的地震数量最多。

    Abstract:

    Seismic station records of M ≥4. 0 earthquakes in the Yunnan Regional Digital Networks in 2000 ~ 2011 were used to determine near earthquake magnitude ML and wave magnitude MS of 433 earthquake waveform data. The speed data were simulated: near earthquake magnitude ML was simulated in terms of short cycle seismographs by DD-1 records,and surface wave magnitude MS in terms of the long cycle seismographs by SK records. All the ML and MS data were then man-checked with linear regression and orthogonal regression and obtain the conversion formula between them. Results showed that the formula MS = 1. 13ML - 1. 08 used since the 1970s may cause problems when applied to the Yunnan region. The adjusted formula of MS = 1. 13ML - 0. 86 is more applicable as the new conversion relationship. Meanwhile,the comparison between the recorded data from Yunnan seismic network and the national seismic network shows the ML difference of - 0. 2 ~ 0. 4 in most of these data with 0. 2 as the majority and MS difference between - 0. 4 ~ 0. 2 with - 0. 2 as the majority.

    参考文献
    陈运泰、刘瑞丰,2004,地震的震级,地震地磁观测与研究,25(6),1 ~ 12。
    陈运泰、吴忠良、王培德等,2000,数字地震学,1 ~ 30,北京:地震出版社。
    郭履灿、庞明虎,1981,面波震级和它的台基校正值,地震学报,3(3),312 ~ 320。
    刘瑞丰,2003,地震参数,7 ~ 15,北京:地震出版社。
    刘瑞丰、陈运泰、Peter Bormann 等,2006,中国地震台网与美国地震台网测定震级的对比:Ⅱ. 面波震级,地震学报,28 (1 ),1 ~ 7。
    刘瑞丰、陈运泰、任枭等,2007,中国地震台网震级的对比,地震学报,29(5),467 ~ 476。
    汪素云、王健、俞言祥等,2010,基于中国地震台网观测报告的ML与MS经验关系,中国地震,26(1),14 ~ 22。
    Carroll R I,Ruppert D,1996,The use and misuse of orthogonal regression in linear errors-in-variables models,The American Statistician,50(1),1 ~ 6.
    Draper N R,Smith H,1998,Applied Regression Analysis,New York: John Wiley & Sons:100 ~ 125.
    Fulier W A,1987,Measurement Error Models,New York: John Wiley & Sons:20 ~ 30.
    Gutenberg B,Richter C F,1956a,Earthquake magnitude,intensity,energy and acceleration,Bull Seism Soc Am,46,105 ~145.
    Gutenberg B,Richter C F,1956b,Magnitude and energy of earthquakes,Annali di Geofisica,91,1 ~ 15.
    Madansky A,1959,The fitting of straight lines when both variables are subject to error,J Amer Statist Assoc,54,173 ~ 205.
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

杨晶琼,杨周胜,蔡明军,许亚吉,梁勇.云南地区近震震级与面波震级转换关系研究[J].中国地震,2013,29(4):513-521

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:2855
  • 下载次数: 3743
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2013-06-15
  • 录用日期:2013-06-28
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-02-26
文章二维码
您是第2857239位访问者
中国地震 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
请使用 Firefox、Chrome、IE10、IE11、360极速模式、搜狗极速模式、QQ极速模式等浏览器,其他浏览器不建议使用!