利用接收函数研究腾冲火山区地壳结构
作者:
中图分类号:

P315

基金项目:

中国地震局“三结合”课题(3JH-202301034)和云南省地震科技创新团队(CXTD202412)共同资助


Study of the Crustal Structure of Tengchong Volcanic Region by Using the Receiving Function
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [44]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    腾冲火山是中国规模较大的新生代火山群之一,壳内岩浆活动情况一直广受关注。为探讨腾冲火山区的深部构造特征,基于腾冲火山区(24°40'N~25°30'N,98°15'E~98°45'E)11个固定台站和1个喜马拉雅Ⅰ期流动台站记录的600多个远震波形三分量数据,提取时间域P波接收函数,利用接收函数Pms波分裂到时方差最小法计算腾冲火山区地壳各向异性参数。引入去除混响滤波器消除沉积层对接收函数的影响,采用适用于地壳各向异性介质的接收函数H-κ-c 方法,计算地壳厚度、波速比和泊松比。结果显示,腾冲火山区地壳各向异性慢波延时在0.1~0.5s之间,平均延时为0.27s,该区的地壳各向异性可能主要来自中上地壳,各台站快波偏振方向以NE-SW向、近N-S向为主,与主要的断层、最大压应力方向一致。地壳厚度在 35.5~39.5km 之间,波速比在1.71~1.9之间,泊松比在0.24~0.308之间,该区具有高泊松比值特征。结合前人的研究结果,认为地壳泊松比最大的两个区域,即腾冲—沙坝台一带、马站—民振台一带下方可能存在岩浆囊,地热活动强烈的热海和热水塘地区,热量可能横向来自其他区域,热海台附近的热能可能来源于其东侧,热水塘台附近的热能可能来源于其东北侧和西侧。腾冲地区不同台站地壳平均泊松比的差异主要受壳内岩浆囊和火山喷发活动的影响。

    Abstract:

    Tengchong volcano area,as one of the large Cenozoic volcanic groups in China,has drawn significant attention due to its crustal magmatic activity. To investigate the deep structural characteristics of the Tengchong volcanic region,we analyzed over 600 three-component seismic datasets from 11 permanent and one temporary station as part of ChinArray Phase I,covering the coordinates(24°40'~25°30'N,98°15'~98°45'E). The time-domain P-wave receiver function was extracted,and crustal anisotropy parameters were calculated using the Pms wave split time variance minimization method. To mitigate the impact of sedimentary layers on the receiver function,a reverberation removal filter was applied. Using the H-κ-c method,which is effective for anisotropic crustal media,we calculated crustal thickness, vP/vS ratios,and Poisson ratio. The results indicate that the anisotropic slow wave delay ranges from 0.1s to 0.5s seconds,with an average delay of 0.27s. The crustal anisotropy in the Tengchong volcanic region likely originates from the middle to upper crust. The polarization direction of the fast wave predominantly aligns with the NE-SW and N-S directions,corresponding to the orientation of the major faults and maximum compressive stress in the region. Crustal thickness varies between 35.5 and 39.5km, vP/vS ratios range from 1.71 to 1.9,and Poisson ratio lies between 0.24 and 0.308. Notably,the region exhibits high Poisson ratio values,suggesting possible magmatic chambers beneath the TNC-SBT and MZT-MIZ areas,which show the highest Poisson ratios. For regions with significant geothermal activity,such as RHT and RST,the thermal energy appears to be sourced horizontally from adjacent areas-east of RHT and northeast and west of RST. The variations in Poisson ratio across different stations in the Tengchong volcanic region are likely influenced by the presence of magma chambers in the crust and ongoing volcanic activity. These findings provide important insights into the complex magmatic processes and the deep structure of the Tengchong volcanic region.

    参考文献
    陈浩朋,李志伟,储日升,等. 2018. 云南地区地壳上地幔三维S波速度与径向各向异性结构研究. 地球物理学报,61(8):3219~3236.
    陈江,王苏,太树刚,等. 2018. 从远震P波的尾波里分离高信噪比的S波. 云南大学学报(自然科学版),40(2):279~286.
    陈克非,林叶,申文豪,等. 2023. 腾冲火山起源的地球物理和地球化学研究进展. 地球与行星物理论评,54(2):216~230.
    邓嘉美,金明培,赵家本,等. 2014. 云南地区地壳厚度与泊松比变化及其意义. 中国地震,30(4):583~596.
    段毅,危自根,杨小林,等. 2019. 腾冲火山结构研究进展和展望. 地球物理学进展,34(4):1288~1297.
    韩明,李建有,徐晓雅,等. 2017. 按方位叠加接收函数分析青藏高原东南缘的地壳各向异性. 地球物理学报,60(12):4537~4556.
    嵇少丞,王茜,杨文采. 2009. 华北克拉通泊松比与地壳厚度的关系及其大地构造意义. 地质学报,83(3):324~330.
    姜朝松. 1998. 腾冲地区新生代火山活动分期. 地震研究,(4):30~39.
    姜枚,谭捍东,彭淼,等. 2016. 腾冲火山构造区马站岩浆囊地球物理特征的再探讨. 中国地质,43(5):1688~1696.
    姜枚,谭捍东,张聿文,等. 2012. 云南腾冲火山构造区马站-固东岩浆囊的地球物理模式. 地球学报,33(5):731~739.
    李辉,彭松柏,乔卫涛,等. 2011. 根据多时相夜间MODIS LST推断的腾冲地区新生代火山岩岩浆囊分布与活动特征. 岩石学报,27(10):2873~2882.
    李俊秀,叶涛,张慧茜,等. 2021. 腾冲火山多地球物理参数模型. 地球物理学报,64(10):3657~3668.
    李孟奎. 2016. 青藏高原东南部及腾冲火山区地壳上地幔S波速度结构研究. 博士学位论文. 武汉: 武汉大学.
    李雪垒,胥颐,汪晟. 2017. 腾冲火山区S波速度结构与岩浆活动特征. 科学通报,62(26):3067~3077.
    李永华,吴庆举,田小波,等. 2009. 用接收函数方法研究云南及其邻区地壳上地幔结构. 地球物理学报,52(1):67~80.
    毛慧玲,秦嘉政. 2011. 腾冲地震台数字地震记录S波分裂研究. 地震研究,34(4):494~497.
    秦嘉政,皇甫岗,王绍晋,等. 1997. 腾冲火山活动区的烈度衰减及环境应力场特征. 地震研究,20(2):212~217.
    孙长青,雷建设,李聪,等. 2013. 云南地区地壳各向异性及其动力学意义. 地球物理学报,56(12):4095~4105.
    谭捍东,姜枚,林昌洪,等. 2013. 云南腾冲火山构造区的电性结构特征及其地质意义. 中国地质,40(3):800~806.
    王雪鹤,李永华,呼楠. 2021. 腾冲地区近震S波分裂研究. 地球物理学报,64(1):131~145.
    查小惠,雷建设. 2013. 云南地区地壳厚度和泊松比研究. 中国科学: 地球科学,43(3):446~456.
    查小惠,吕坚,鲍志诚,等. 2020. 接收函数H-k叠加方法研究综述. CT理论与应用研究,29(3):369~379.
    张龙,胡毅力,秦敏,等. 2015. 云南腾冲火山区地壳及岩石圈厚度研究. 地球物理学报,58(5):1622~1633.
    张艺,高原,赵镇岭. 2018. 川滇地区壳幔地震各向异性研究进展. 中国地震,34(2):207~218.
    赵慈平,冉华,陈坤华. 2006. 由相对地热梯度推断的腾冲火山区现存岩浆囊. 岩石学报,22(6):1517~1528.
    赵慈平,冉华,陈坤华. 2011. 腾冲火山区壳内岩浆囊现今温度: 来自温泉逸出气体CO2、CH4间碳同位素分馏的估计. 岩石学报,27(10):2883~2897.
    周真恒,向才英,覃玉玺,等. 1997. 云南深部热流研究. 西北地震学报,(4):52~58.
    Cai Y,Wu J P,Fang L H,et al. 2016. Crustal anisotropy and deformation of the southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau revealed by Pms splitting. J Asian Earth Sci,121:120~126.
    Chen F,Satir M,Ji J,et al. 2002. Nd-Sr-Pb isotopes of Tengchong Cenozoic volcanic rocks from western Yunnan,China:evidence for an enriched-mantle source. J Asian Earth Sci,21(1):39~45.
    Chen Y L,Niu F L,Liu R F,et al. 2010. Crustal structure beneath China from receiver function analysis. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,115(B3):03307.
    Christensen N I. 1996. Poisson's ratio and crustal seismology. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,101(B2):3139~3156.
    Christensen N I,Mooney W D. 1995. Seismic velocity structure and composition of the continental crust:a global view. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,100(B6):9761~9788.
    Kennett B L N,Engdahl E R. 1991. Travel times for global earthquake location and phase identification. Geophys J Int,105(2):429~465.
    Langston C A. 1979. Structure under Mount Rainier,Washington,inferred from teleseismic body waves. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,84(B9):4749~4762.
    Li J T,Song X D,Wang P,et al. 2019. A generalized H-κ method with harmonic corrections on Ps and its crustal multiples in receiver functions. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,124(4):3782~3801.
    Ligorría J P,Ammon C J. 1999. Iterative deconvolution and receiver-function estimation. Bull Seismol Soc Am,89(5):1395~1400.
    Peng H C,Badal J,Hu J F,et al. 2021. Lithospheric dynamics in the vicinity of the Tengchong volcanic field(southeastern margin of Tibet):an investigation using P receiver functions. Geophys J Int,224(2):1326~1343.
    Rümpker G,Kaviani A,Latifi K. 2014. Ps-splitting analysis for multilayered anisotropic media by azimuthal stacking and layer stripping. Geophys J Int,199(1):146~163.
    Savage M K. 1999. Seismic anisotropy and mantle deformation:what have we learned from shear wave splitting?Rev Geophys,37(1):65~106.
    Yang H Y,Hu J F,Hu Y L,et al. 2013. Crustal structure in the Tengchong volcanic area and position of the magma chambers. J Asian Earth Sci,73:48~56.
    Yuan X H,Ni J,Kind R,et al. 1997. Lithospheric and upper mantle structure of southern Tibet from a seismological passive source experiment. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,102(B12):27491~27500.
    Zandt G,Ammon C J. 1995. Continental crust composition constrained by measurements of crustal Poisson's ratio. Nature,374(6518):152~154.
    Zhao L,Luo Y,Liu T Y,et al. 2013. Earthquake focal mechanisms in Yunnan and their inference on the regional stress field. Bull Seismol Soc Am,103(4):2498~2507.
    Zhu L P,Kanamori H. 2000. Moho depth variation in southern California from teleseismic receiver functions. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,105(B2):2969~2980.
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李秋凤,张天继,刘克骧,张山元,李凤英.利用接收函数研究腾冲火山区地壳结构[J].中国地震,2024,40(3):630-646

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-12
  • 最后修改日期:2024-04-03
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-11-16
文章二维码
您是第位访问者
中国地震 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
请使用 Firefox、Chrome、IE10、IE11、360极速模式、搜狗极速模式、QQ极速模式等浏览器,其他浏览器不建议使用!