矿山爆炸当量估算方法分析——以内蒙古黑岱沟露天煤矿为例
作者:
中图分类号:

P315

基金项目:

内蒙古自治区地震局局长基金课题(2024MS02)和内蒙古自治区自然基金项目(2023LHMS04006)共同资助


Analysis of Mining Explosion Equivalent Estimation Methods—A Case of Heidaigou Open-pit Coal Mine in Inner Mongolia
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [23]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [14]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    爆炸当量是描述爆炸能量的重要参数,准确快速地估算爆炸当量是开展应急救援工作的关键。随着观测技术的不断革新与地震学方法的快速发展,利用地震学方法进行估算成为爆炸当量估算的一种重要手段。本文通过收集内蒙古黑岱沟露天煤矿爆炸资料和前人研究成果,利用爆炸地震效率与震级-当量经验关系两种手段研究矿山爆炸当量的估算方法。结果表明,当矿山等爆炸事件发生后,可利用爆炸产生的地震波形记录计算地震波能量,进而通过爆炸地震效率估算爆炸当量,本文得到的矿山爆炸事件其地震转化效率约为0.02%~0.07%。此外,本文建立了适用于矿山爆炸事件的地方性震级ML与炸药当量之间的经验关系,通过该关系也可以对矿山爆炸事件的炸药当量进行估算。

    Abstract:

    The explosion equivalent is a critical parameter for quantifying the energy released by an explosion,and its accurate and rapid estimation is essential for effective emergency response and rescue operations. With advances in observation technology and the rapid development of seismological methods,seismological approaches have become a key means for estimating explosion equivalents. This study investigates methods for estimating the explosion equivalent in mining areas by analyzing explosion data from the Heidaigou open-pit coal mine in Inner Mongolia and incorporating findings from previous research. Two approaches are explored:the explosion seismic efficiency method and the magnitude-equivalent empirical relationship. The results indicate that seismic wave energy generated by explosions can be derived from recorded seismic waveforms. Using the calculated seismic wave energy and explosion seismic efficiency,the explosion equivalent can be accurately estimated. The seismic conversion efficiency of mining explosions determined in this study ranges from approximately 0.02% to 0.07%. Additionally,an empirical relationship between the local magnitude(ML) and explosion equivalent,specific to mining explosion events,is established. This relationship provides an alternative method for estimating the explosion equivalent.

    参考文献
    江文彬,陈颙,彭菲. 2020. 2019年3月江苏响水化工厂爆炸当量的估计. 地球物理学报,63(2):541~550.
    孔韩东,王婷婷. 2018. 爆破当量研究综述. 国际地震动态,(2):9~25.
    林鑫,姚振兴. 2016. 利用区域地震波形振幅包络约束朝鲜地下核实验的埋深和当量. 地球物理学报,59(6):2066~2079.
    刘瑞丰,孔韩东,李赞. 2018. 能量震级测定方法研究. 国际地震动态,(8):56.
    刘瑞丰,李赞,张玲,等. 2019. 爆炸当量估算的初步研究. 地震地磁观测与研究,40(4):1~7.
    王志宇,郝春月. 2023. 基于海拉尔台阵资料的爆炸事件震级测定和当量估计. 地震学报,45(6):1079-1090.
    袁乃荣,刘瑞丰,李赞,等. 2018. 能量震级及其测定. 地震地磁观测与研究,39(5):1~7.
    张达,戴锐,曾志毅,等. 2021. BSN矿山微震监测技术及其应用. 中国地震,37(2):332~348.
    张少泉,郭建明. 1984. 爆炸地震的能量转换系数计算及其应用. 地球物理学报,27(6):537~547.
    赵永,刘卫红,高艳玲. 1995. 北京地区地震、爆破和矿震的记录图识别. 地震地磁观测与研究,16(4):48~54.
    支明,梁建宏,孙丽,等. 2023. 地震自动速报中常用震级测定方法的适用性研究. 中国地震,39(4):868~882.
    Bowers D,Marshall P D,Douglas A. 2001. The level of deterrence provided by data from the SPITS seismometer array to possible violations of the Comprehensive Test Ban in the Novaya Zemlya region. Geophys J Int,146(2):425~438.
    Flynn E C,Stump B W. 1988. Effects of source depth on near-source seismograms. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,93(B5):4820~4834.
    Ford S R,Rodgers A J,Xu H M,et al. 2014. Partitioning of seismoacoustic energy and estimation of yield and height-of-burst/depth-of-burial for near-surface explosions. Bull Seismol Soc Am,104(2):608~623.
    Gutenberg B,Richter C F. 1942. Earthquake magnitude,intensity,energy,and acceleration(Second paper).Bull.seism.soc.am,32(2):105~145.
    Gutenberg B,Richter C F. 1954. Seismicity of the Earth and Associated Phenomena. 2nd ed. Princeton:Princeton University Press.
    Haskell N A. 1967. Analytic approximation for the elastic radiation from a contained underground explosion. J Geophys Res,72(10):2583~2587.
    Murphy J R. 1996. Types of seismic events and their source descriptions. In:Husebye E S,Dainty A M. Monitoring a Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Dordrecht:Springer.
    Nuttli O W. 1986. Yield estimates of Nevada test site explosions obtained from seismic Lg waves. J Geophys Res:Solid Earth,91(B2):2137~2151.
    Patton H J. 1988. Application of Nuttli's method to estimate yield of Nevada Test Site explosions recorded on Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's digital seismic system. Bull Seismol Soc Am,78(5):1759~1772.
    Ringdal F,Marshall P D,Alewine R W. 1992. Seismic yield determination of Soviet underground nuclear explosions at the Shagan River test site. Geophys J Int,109(1):65~77.
    Stroujkova A,Leidig M,Bonner J L. 2015. Effect of the detonation velocity of explosives on seismic radiation. Bull Seismol Soc Am,105(2A):599~611.
    Zhang M,Wen L X. 2013. High-precision location and yield of North Korea's 2013 nuclear test. Geophys Res Lett,40(12):2941~2946.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

张珂,马亮,王玥,王鑫,王勇.矿山爆炸当量估算方法分析——以内蒙古黑岱沟露天煤矿为例[J].中国地震,2024,40(4):819-830

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:82
  • 下载次数: 156
  • HTML阅读次数: 310
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-03
  • 最后修改日期:2024-06-06
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-01-02
文章二维码
您是第2953738位访问者
中国地震 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司
请使用 Firefox、Chrome、IE10、IE11、360极速模式、搜狗极速模式、QQ极速模式等浏览器,其他浏览器不建议使用!